A Theoretical and Numerical Analysis of the Worst-Case Size of Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams
Jan 1, 2019·
·
1 min read

Didier Verna
Type
Abstract
Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) and in particular ROBDDs (Reduced Ordered
BDDs) are a common data structure for manipulating Boolean expressions,
integrated circuit design, type inferencers, model checkers, and many other
applications. Although the ROBDD is a lightweight data structure to
implement, the behavior, in terms of memory allocation, may not be obvious
to the program architect. We explore experimentally, numerically, and
theoretically the typical and worst-case ROBDD sizes in terms of number of
nodes and residual compression ratios, as compared to unreduced BDDs. While
our theoretical results are not surprising, as they are in keeping with
previously known results, we believe our method contributes to the current
body of research by our experimental and statistical treatment of ROBDD
sizes. In addition, we provide an algorithm to calculate the worst-case
size. Finally, we present an algorithm for constructing a worst-case ROBDD
of a given number of variables. Our approach may be useful to projects
deciding whether the ROBDD is the appropriate data structure to use, and in
building worst-case examples to test their code.